Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Teaching Philosophy

I hate doing things that I am bad at. I hate even more doing things where I feel uninformed and doomed to badness. How does one go about writing a teaching philosophy for student teaching applications when one is 4 weeks into deciding to be a teacher? How in the world do I know how I'll conduct my classroom or what overarching themes will guide my instruction, student relationships, and classroom management? I feel awfully green and clueless.

What do I know about teaching? I know that I like math and physics. I know that I find them pristine and beautiful. I know that I think I might be able to transfer the information to students, possibly even well. I know that I am an empathetic and caring person who wants to be where I can enter into a person's experience and help them find wisdom and that that probably makes for a good teacher. I know that I feel like I lack the experience of a teacher that cares about me because perhaps math teachers don't tend to be the caring sort, and I could fill a void there. So, here we go. A sketch of my teaching philosophy.


Invention and Investigation in Mathematics
Many students associate math instruction with being taught a trick to finding the right answer to problems. I was lost in this trick-wielding arithmetic I learned as a child until later when I understood how to think critically and reason about the structure of mathematical systems. In fact, as a high-school student, I often came home from school wondering why the geometry or calculus methods I was learning in school worked, and I would methodically reason out and prove them to myself. It wasn’t until I received college-level coursework that I discovered the intriguing world of logic and abstract ideas behind the arithmetic we use, and it thrilled me. While I was working with the Educational Program for Gifted Youth at Stanford University, I discovered that their curriculum introduced students to logic and reasoning at a much younger age (2nd grade), and I found that what I suspected was true – the math facts and tricks stuck better with students when they better understood the basis for their usage. I enjoyed watching students catch onto the excitement I have for math at a younger age as well.
Due to my personal experience in learning and teaching online, I believe students will gain more from their mathematics instruction with a more investigative approach than the usual lecture and homework problems. I will rethink the traditional instruction I’ve received before I pass it on to students in order to ensure that they learn how to think critically and mathematically about a problem. The key to a mathematical problem is not the answer but the thinking process that produces the answer. I must draw on the methods of teachers in other content areas and then ask myself, “That was a literature course, but how can I apply the same fervor to mathematics?” “What is it specifically in mathematics that I find inspiring?” “How do you teach the beauty of abstract reasoning to students?” “How do I create a deep, investigative learning to motivate their minds?”
A key to teaching students a new method of understanding mathematics is an open environment, a place where no question is too stupid to ask; rather, curiosity is encouraged. Students are too familiar with the fact-regurgitation mathematics in which they are “right “ or “wrong” which stifles many students’ ingenuity. I see my role as a teacher to retrain students to explore mathematics and help them hone their thinking skills and creativity so that they can experience the excitement of discovery, that fabulous “Eureka!” moment of an epiphany when they feel that they truly have a handle on the concept as their own. I will attain a motivating classroom environment by introducing new material with enthusiasm, encouraging the students to explore the familiar material by asking them diverse questionds, requiring them to write about their thinking processes as they work problems, and answering their enquiries by modeling the sort of openness and investigative spirit I hope to see from them.
I was brought into teaching because I am myself an incorrigible student, and I would like to help my students to continue to grow and explore as they mature through adolescence. I will to exemplify the professionalism (timeliness, respectfulness, organization and planning, integrity) that students will need to succeed in their academic, work and personal life. Through my teaching experience, I will remain open to learning and correction and continue to grow professionally throughout my career. I want to continue to take courses to remain up-to-date in relevant topics and discoveries in mathematics and education and to keep myself exploring and creative in my instructional techniques.

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Experience 6.2 - Student-Centered Instructional Activities

Reflecting on my past involvement with student-centered instructional activities

Brainstorming - F, E
Buzz session
Case study - F
Committee
Cooperative learning - F
Debate - F
Discovery - F, E, L
Discussion,whole-class - F, E, L
Field trip - F, E, L
Fishbowl
Forum
Inquiry - F
Jury trial - F, E, L
Learning activity center - F
Panel discussion
Project or independent study - F, E
Role-playing - F, E, L
Roundtable discussion - F, E, L
Simulation - F, E, L
Sociodrama -F
Symposium

"F" for Familiar with
"E" for Effectively used.
"L" for Liked

Exercise 6.1 - Direct Experience Learning

Nearly the entirety of my high school physics course was taught by experiment/direct experience. The teacher, Mrs. Daniels, had us do daily experiments to discover the principles of mechanics, optics, etc. We would regroup and summarize periodically, but most of the instruction was experientially-based.

We would come in every day with our graphing calculators, she would give us worksheets of instructions and charts and tables, and we'd get to work and set up experiments with motorized carts or colored lights and take data. We would graph or chart our findings and draw conclusions. Then, we would discuss our experiences as a class and share our data, and Mrs. Daniels would supply the formal forms of the theories we had studied.

I think I remember this particular class because it is very unique to have such complicated material presented almost completely through access mode teaching. This is also one of the few direct experience experiences in math or science that I can remember liking. In high school, I remember finding exploratory tasks in math and science "light", rather lacking in content. However, in this case, I really enjoyed the thrill of figuring out how acceleration and velocity were directional. I remember the moment that the I figured out why the acceleration graphs of something speeding up toward me or slowing down away from me looked similar, and that moment was full of the intrinsic motivation teachers hope for. 

I also remember her first test was the first time I ever got a low-end B and it was shocking! That definitely lit a fire under me and taught me how to study!

However, I would have to admit that the course somewhat poorly prepared me for college-level physics courses. While it did teach me content in a personal and rememberable way, it didn't drill into me the hard-core knowledge I was going to need for higher-level study. But, I suppose I made it in the end through many an upper-level physics course, so maybe it wasn't so lacking afterall....